DeparturesIndigenous Virginia: Powhatan And Cherokee Histories

The Trail of Tears and Cherokee Resilience

Indigenous Virginia: Powhatan and Cherokee Histories — illustrated by woven reed basket with river stones and tobacco leaves, Victorian botanical illustration style.
Indigenous Virginia: Powhatan and Cherokee Histories

By the late 1700s, European arrivals had severely disrupted Indigenous societies with new forms of warfare and disease . Despite these pressures, the Cherokee remained the primary Indigenous nation in the Southern Appalachians . They successfully adapted to new economic realities, such as the deerskin trade out of Charles Town, while keeping their traditional matrilineal clan system and local government. However, the 19th century brought a devastating shift in United States policy that would test their resilience.

The Policy of Removal

In the early 1800s, the U.S. government’s approach to Native Americans changed dramatically. In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, which became the foundation of a new federal "removal policy" . This law aimed to push Indigenous nations out of the Southeast to open up land for white settlers and farming. Like a landlord evicting tenants to renovate a building, the government sought to clear the land for its own purposes.

The Cherokee were not the only nation targeted by this law. Other groups, like the Choctaw, were also expelled from their southeastern lands. Many Indigenous people fiercely protested this loss of their ancestral homes, leaving behind powerful written testimonies and legal statements against the policy . Despite widespread resistance, a small, unauthorized faction of Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Echota . This controversial agreement traded Cherokee lands in the East for territory west of the Mississippi River.

The Trail of Tears

The majority of the Cherokee people rejected the Treaty of New Echota, but the U.S. government used it as a legal excuse to force them out. The military was sent to enforce the treaty, uprooting thousands of Cherokee families from their homes. This forced migration to the designated Indian Territory—located in modern-day Oklahoma—is known as the "Trail of Tears" .

The journey was brutal for everyone involved. Families were forced to march hundreds of miles over rough terrain. Along the route, they endured freezing weather, starvation, and deadly outbreaks of disease . These conditions acted like a slow-moving storm, claiming the lives of thousands of Cherokee before they ever reached their destination.

Redefining Indigenous Sovereignty

As the federal government expanded its territory, it also changed how it viewed Indigenous nations in the eyes of the law. Historically, the U.S. had treated tribes as sovereign governments. Because they were independent nations, their members and lands were supposed to be subject to tribal authority, not federal control .

However, the court system began to alter this relationship to justify greater control over Native peoples. A major turning point was the 1846 Supreme Court case United States v. Rogers. The court essentially decided that the government could treat Native Americans as a racial group rather than as citizens of their own independent nations. By claiming a paternal—or fatherly—role, the government gave itself permission to interfere in tribal affairs and ignore tribal laws. This legal shift stripped away their political independence and replaced it with racial management . This concept is crucial for understanding later 20th-century racial classification laws.

Cultural Continuity in the Diaspora

Despite the profound trauma of the Trail of Tears and the loss of their Appalachian homeland, the Cherokee showed incredible resilience. In the new Indian Territory, they rebuilt their communities, reestablished their town governance, and adapted their Southern Appalachian Iroquoian language and traditions to a completely different environment. They proved that a culture is like a tree; even if it is moved to new soil, it can still grow deep roots.

Furthermore, the Cherokee removal was not absolute. A small number of Cherokee managed to avoid the forced march and remained hidden in the southern mountains . This group laid the foundation for what would become the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. The resulting diaspora—the scattering of their people across different regions—created distinct Cherokee communities that continue to thrive and preserve their cultural heritage today.

Key Terms

  • Indian Removal Act — An 1830 U.S. law that established a federal policy of relocating Indigenous nations from their ancestral lands in the Southeast to territory west of the Mississippi River.
  • Treaty of New Echota — A controversial agreement signed by an unauthorized faction of the Cherokee, which the U.S. government used to justify the forced removal of the Cherokee people from their eastern lands.
  • Trail of Tears — The forced relocation and brutal march of the Cherokee and other Indigenous nations to Indian Territory, resulting in thousands of deaths from disease, starvation, and exposure.
Explore related books & resources on Amazon ↗As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. #ad

Verified Sources

1OpenAlex

The Southern Appalachians: A History of the Landscape

Susan L. Yarnell · 1998 · Unknown

3eric

U.S. Court of Claims Deposition of Kish um us tubbee. Teaching with Documents.

Blondo, Richard A., And Others · 1994 · ERIC (U.S. Department of Education)

4eric

General Orders Pertaining to Removal of the Cherokees.

Potter, Lee Ann, Schamel, Wynell · 1999 · ERIC (U.S. Department of Education)

Keep Learning